- Junior Management Science, Volume 9, Issue 3, September 2024
- Junior Management Science, Volume 9, Issue 2, June 2024
- Junior Management Science, Volume 9, Issue 1, March 2024
- Junior Management Science, Volume 8, Issue 4, December 2023
- Junior Management Science, Volume 8, Issue 3, September 2023
- Junior Management Science, Volume 8, Issue 2, June 2023
- Junior Management Science, Volume 8, Issue 1, March 2023
- Junior Management Science, Volume 7, Issue 5, December 2022
- Junior Management Science, Volume 7, Issue 4, September 2022
- Junior Management Science, Volume 7, Issue 3, July 2022
- Junior Management Science, Volume 7, Issue 2, June 2022
- Junior Management Science, Volume 7, Issue 1, March 2022
- Junior Management Science, Volume 6, Issue 4, December 2021
- Junior Management Science, Volume 6, Issue 3, September 2021
- Junior Management Science, Volume 6, Issue 2, June 2021
- Junior Management Science, Volume 6, Issue 1, March 2021
- Junior Management Science, Volume 5, Issue 4, December 2020
- Junior Management Science, Volume 5, Issue 3, September 2020
- Junior Management Science, Volume 5, Issue 2, June 2020
- Junior Management Science, Volume 5, Issue 1, March 2020
- Junior Management Science, Volume 4, Issue 4, December 2019
- Junior Management Science, Volume 4, Issue 3, September 2019
- Junior Management Science, Volume 4, Issue 2, June 2019
- Junior Management Science, Volume 4, Issue 1, March 2019
- Junior Management Science, Volume 3, Issue 4, December 2018
- Junior Management Science, Volume 3, Issue 3, September 2018
- Junior Management Science, Volume 3, Issue 2, June 2018
- Junior Management Science, Volume 3, Issue 1, March 2018
- Junior Management Science, Volume 2, Issue 3, December 2017
- Junior Management Science, Volume 2, Issue 2, September 2017
- Junior Management Science, Volume 2, Issue 1, June 2017
- Junior Management Science, Volume 1, Issue 2, December 2016
- Junior Management Science, Volume 1, Issue 1, June 2016
Transparency and organizational legitimacy: an experimental study based on a fictitious company
Max-Gerrit Meinel, Vienna University of Economics and Business (Master thesis)
Junior Management Science 8(4), 2023, 926-954
In this paper it was empirically reviewed, if a high level of corporate transparency leads to an increase in companies’ organizational legitimacy. Through an experimental design, individually perceived organizational legitimacy was measured based on Suchman’s (1995, S. 578–579) definition of pragmatic, moral, and cognitive legitimacy. For this purpose, the experimental group (n = 108) received a stimulus indicating high transparency while the control group (n = 112) was presented with a very limited amount of information indicating low transparency for a fictitious airline. The experimental stimulus consisted of legitimacy sources such as media reports, rankings, surveys, and internal press reports. The empirical results only suggest an increase in moral legitimacy for the experimental group. Nevertheless, organizational legitimacy decreases less for the experimental group compared to the control group. Also, the processing time of the transparency offer documents presented had no effect on the level of organizational legitimacy. Although a quantitatively high transparency offer has stronger effect on organizational legitimacy than a quantitatively low transparency offer, it cannot be assumed that transparency has a fundamentally legitimacy-enhancing effect. Moreover, the mere availability of information seems to play a greater role than its processing time.
Keywords: Transparency; Organizational legitimacy; Airlines; Corporate governance; Experiment.